Mark,
this is not just a matter of "posessions", but rather overall intelligence,
not all GFYers are created equal
;-)))

God Bless
;-)))

Is not intelligence relative to the company one keeps?

Asuta my friend! :^)

to answer the question of which "Marx" made the greatest contribution, i would say that ones ideas were the root cause of the deaths of 10's of millions across Eastern Europe, Asia and Central and South America... and one had a silly TV show that made people laugh.

One could say the same thing about Jesus. But it would be absurd to say Jesus was the root of the problem yes?

One could say the same thing about Jesus. But it would be absurd to say Jesus was the root of the problem yes?[/b][/quote]
of course...because Jesus never existed, Karl Marx is another story.

One could say the same thing about Jesus. But it would be absurd to say Jesus was the root of the problem yes?[/b][/quote]
what would absurd about pointing out the 100's of millions of men, women and children slaughtered in the name of religion and peace and love and happiness. its a matter of historical fact.

Who said it would be absurd to say that people were slaughtered in the name of God?

All I said was its absurd to blame it on Jesus. Just as absurd as blaming Marx for Stalin's transgression.

If I took something you said, twisted it around and used it as justification for chopping up your family with a hatchet, is it my fault or your fault?



Last edited by [Labret] at Nov 6 2003, 09:07 AM

Who said it would be absurd to say that people were slaughtered in the name of God?

All I said was its absurd to blame it on Jesus. Just as absurd as blaming Marx for Stalin's transgression.

If I took something you said, twisted it around and used it as justification for chopping up your family with a hatchet, is it my fault or your fault?[/b][/quote]
YOU sir, must contact me. 3522039.

Who said it would be absurd to say that people were slaughtered in the name of God?

All I said was its absurd to blame it on Jesus. Just as absurd as blaming Marx for Stalin's transgression.

If I took something you said, twisted it around and used it as justification for chopping up your family with a hatchet, is it my fault or your fault?[/b][/quote]
"right" or "wrong" is primarily determined by the number of those who believe. the more people that believe in an idea, the more "right" it usually becomes.

If you as an individual comitted an act of murder by twisting my words around, then you would be wrong simply because there would be no safety in numbers.

If you were skilled enough to get 1,000,000 people to slaughter another 100,000,000.... you would have a chair at the UN and most likely, on the Security Council.

and now you know why I am a Marxist ........
of the Groucho variety :groucho:

"right" or "wrong" is primarily determined by the number of those who believe. the more people that believe in an idea, the more "right" it usually becomes.

If you as an individual comitted an act of murder by twisting my words around, then you would be wrong simply because there would be no safety in numbers.

If you were skilled enough to get 1,000,000 people to slaughter another 100,000,000.... you would have a chair at the UN and most likely, on the Security Council.[/b][/quote]

That is not an answer. If the question would have been, "Were the crusades right or wrong", perhaps. Were the crusades Jesus fault? Absurd. It is more Paul's fault for spreading the semite disease into the diaspora in the first place. But I digress...

So following your logic, if I can gather up some followers to help me kill and rape children, using your words as justification, it then becomes your fault?

LadyM, at school and dont have icq on my laptop. Will be back home in a few hours.

Harpo = Trotsky?

Harpo = Trotsky?[/b][/quote]
While Lennon read a book on Marx :awinky:
The quartet practiced in the park

I'll be back later.

I've got to turn off the lights and sing dirges.

With all the Marxist talk I wanted to bump this :groucho: