Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 811709)

Thanx man. You know I need it :( I think everyone on the board knows how mean I am. But I'm trying to be better, really I am.








Trust me :okthumb:

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811707)

I just thought the following would have been imporant information to provide:

Main Points of the Can-Spam Act

• Outlaws the use of false or misleading headers.
• Outlaws the use of deceptive subject lines.
• Requires a clear and conspicuous opt-out mechanism within every commercial email.
• Requires the inclusion of a valid physical postal address within every commercial email.

The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) will be strict in their enforcement of the Can-Spam law and violators may be subject to “cease and desist” orders or penalties up to $11,000 per violation. Criminal prosecution is also possible in the case of egregious offenders, which can result in penalties such as fines, forfeiture of proceeds and equipment. The worst offenders will also be subject to prison time.

I guess we know that legitimate email marketers (such as yourself!) will likely not have to worry about the consequences mentioned above but it’s important to know about the seriousness of this law and how it pertains to affiliate marketing and current prosecutorial motives.

After reviewing the acknowlegment I believe the US Attorney will not be happy with the notice by Top Bucks and ask that it be revised and re- issued. I guess you all disagree with that and are just fine with giving your acknowledgment to the US Attorney's office to support future litigation against you if you are found non-compliant or if someone spams without your knowledge under your domain name or email address and are falsely accused and forced to defend yourself. Good luck with Top Bucks giving you all free legal advise on this one, they couldn't keep themselves out of litigation but maybe they will keep you from it but it looks to me like staying an affiliate and acknowleging this agreement you will be under the "watchful eye."

Originally Posted by helix (Post 811710)

I still cherish my picture of you...lol

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 811712)

So, now you're blackmailing me :blink::huh::unsure:

Originally Posted by helix (Post 811713)

lol....not at all.

Originally Posted by Nymph (Post 811724)

Oh helix... you know I love you long time sailor boy...give me the pic, I'll blackmail him ;)

Originally Posted by helix (Post 811726)

hehe....you are a bad lady. I can't roll over on him that easy.

Originally Posted by Nymph (Post 811727)

Oh please, please, pretty please...with whipped cream & a big juicy cherry on top?

Originally Posted by helix (Post 811728)

heh...you know me better than that. Stop batting your eyes at me woman.
Your charms wont work....lol

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 811711)

Shellee, out of respect for DK, and in my new spirit of being a nice person (it's hard, but I am trying).

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811735)

Actually, lawyers are hired to read between the lines, and when they want to read between the lines of a Civil Consent Decree like the one Cyberheat agreed to, they read things like

Restonic Charged With Criminal Contempt
Court Finds Smith and Schlumberger Guilty of Criminal Contempt for Violating Consent Decree
Criminal Contempt for Violation of Consent Decree in Fair Labor Standards Act Case
FTC Holds Owner of Funderal Home In Criminal Contempt in 2002 for Violating Consent Decree He Entered into Ten Years Before


A finding of criminal contempt for violating a Consent Decree is proper under City of Richmond v. Thornton, 548 F.2d 123
when it is "proved beyond a reasonable doubt that a person willfully, contumaciously, intentionally, or with a wrongful state of mind, violated a decree which was definite, clear, specific, and left no doubt or uncertainty in the minds of those to whom it was addressed."

These legal principles should put rest to the notion that a Consent Decree enforcing CANSPAM regulations is of no greater legal effect than the CANSPAM act itself.

But if you need it made clearer, check out this brief by the Department of Justice, that says:

A key purpose of having clear, objective prohibitions in a consent decree is to avoid future litigation .... A Final Judgment can validly prohibit transactions, even if those transactions would not themselves independently violate the ... laws. A court's equitable power is broad, and not limited to enjoining illegal activity. The court can also impose prophylactic or remedial provisions that prohibit otherwise legal conduct if it concludes that those measures are an aid to, or are necessary or important for, ensuring effective relief.

Prophylactic relief -- or remedial provisions -- Now that I think of it, that's exactly what an industry full of jerkoffs and strung out on Viagra needs!

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811735)

Prophylactic relief -- or remedial provisions -- Now that I think of it, that's exactly what an industry full of jerkoffs and strung out on Viagra needs!

Originally Posted by Mediaguy (Post 811761)

Oh, and this "industry full of jerkoffs and strung out on Viagra" is completely not the impression I've gotten from the shows I've attended, which may or may not be a few shows more than you have.

Originally Posted by rhetorical (Post 811781)

This "person" has zero idea about our business. A jailhouse lawyer with a laptop. Shellee has contributed nothing of any substance and mostly irrelevant ramblings. Personally, I find it interesting that she swallows so much bait so quickly. Now if she could swallow cum in such huge quantities, she would have some credibility in an industry that, after all, bases its very existence cum shots.

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811782)

Please.... Who is really baiting who here? Shoot yourself in the face and swallow your own shit and video it for a quick upsale if you need some attention.

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811735)

Now that I think of it, that's exactly what an industry full of jerkoffs and strung out on Viagra needs!

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 811792)

So now we know what you really think of people in the adult industry. Nicely done, ShelleHale. The next time someone ELSE turns their back to you at a trade show, you will know why.

Originally Posted by rhetorical (Post 811781)

This "person" has zero idea about our business. A jailhouse lawyer with a laptop. Shellee has contributed nothing of any substance and mostly irrelevant ramblings. Personally, I find it interesting that she swallows so much bait so quickly. Now if she could swallow cum in such huge quantities, she would have some credibility in an industry that, after all, bases its very existence cum shots.

Originally Posted by Mediaguy (Post 811831)

Oh! Ouch! I thought this sarettah had closeted herself! Welcome back lol!

I agree her posts have often if not mostly been off-topic or somehow skewed to the subject - I really think she just doesn't finish reading posts - but this is like that over enthusiastic kid in your kindergarten always disrupting class and making noise - in the end, most often, they end up a star pupil with the most points for initiative.

I know. I was one :P

Originally Posted by gonzo (Post 811802)

Only time Ive seen em turn their back on her at a show is the subliminal hint for her to pick up yet ANOTHER check.

Warm weather is here Abomb. Time to get that one Tommy Bahama dry cleaned!

Originally Posted by Mediaguy (Post 811838)

But what on Satan's bad earth would anyone in adult pay her for?

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811843)

Don't you think your credibility would go up a notch if you had more than one girl online and no one in paid chat on a Saturday Night for a platform your selling with a developed talent pool (as you say) IMHO.

Originally Posted by rhetorical (Post 811844)

What has that got to do with the question? Since you have no credibility, who cares. You pay far too much attention trying to rip apart others businesses while your own ain't stellar. Oh I forgot, the Non disclosure thingy.....lololol
Glad you came back, since the last one bit the dust, we needed a new football to kick around.....

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811845)

Are you for real... Your good friends from LCN on here going to town about their expertise in helping new people with starting a cam site and they don't even have one girl online. Who is kidding who - what success could they really have helped me with? Running a chat site with no talent?

What success could their reliant Mbase licensees be having right now? Check out www.latinacamnetwork.com omg no one online. Now don't you think my little www.sexyteaser.com clients might be happier having a girl to chat with when they arrive? Looks like my customers might be a little happier than they would have been when I was over at LCN.

So what was bad about that business decision?

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811845)

Actually, lawyers are hired to read between the lines,

Originally Posted by Shelleehale (Post 811845)

Don't you think your credibility would go up a notch if you had more than one girl online and no one in paid chat on a Saturday Night for a platform your selling with a developed talent pool (as you say) IMHO.

Originally Posted by rhetorical (Post 811847)

What is distressing about you is that you seem hell bent on ripping apart other people's businesses more than promoting your own enterprise. You slag off your Viagara fueled colleagues and still think you will earn respect. Sigh......but you go girl.

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 811835)

Jesus Christ Monkey Balls !

Once again. That is rhetorical.

For fucks sake, the spelling between the 2 names isn't even close. :headwall:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 811856)

Good morning, Greg.
Coffee?

Originally Posted by gonzo (Post 811802)

Only time Ive seen em turn their back on her at a show is the subliminal hint for her to pick up yet ANOTHER check.

Originally Posted by Mediaguy (Post 811861)

And they pay her for what exactly?