Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Countdown to the draft... (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=37019)

dantheman 11-04-2004 02:33 PM

gotcha Jeff. The bottom line is if we need more then we'll recruit more. There''s plenty of young people that are willing and mostly able to defend our nation. IF we have to fight multiple fronts then yeah I can see where it's possible to run short on some long drawn out engaments but this is all just speculation and rumors.
AS of now, our military is in fine form and without a doubt the finest collection of talented young people in the world. DONT short change them, their ready,able and trained to do their part. Next time you come across one, THANK THEM!

Semper Fi :salute:

KeyGuy 11-04-2004 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches+Nov 3 2004, 02:18 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Peaches @ Nov 3 2004, 02:18 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by KeyGuy@Nov 3 2004, 06:17 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches@Nov 3 2004, 02:15 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-KeyGuy

Quote:

Quote:

@Nov 3 2004, 06:11 PM
Easy for you to say, but you said nothing. Englighten me, if you can.


I don't have the desire to enlighten you on this or any other moronic BS you spew. I doubt many here do.


Sure, Peaches. The last defense of the uninformed. Say nothing and hope no one notices.

Wow, you busted me. You're just too smart for any of us here. Yet, here you are after you get banned time and time and time again........ [/b][/quote]
Yeah, peaches. Just too smart for you. But that is a slam dunk. LMFAO

KeyGuy 11-04-2004 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy+Nov 3 2004, 02:26 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (PornoDoggy @ Nov 3 2004, 02:26 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mike AI@Nov 3 2004, 05:12 PM
The reality is as long as the Afgans are not training terrorists, and causing problems outside their borders - no one cares what goes on in the inside.

Afganistan has no oil. :D

Isn't that attitude what got us to where we are today? If we walk away from Afghanistan before we build a truly stable central government, we will have failed.

I don't think quaqmyre fits the situation in Afghanistan, but I think declaring victory at this point calls for a carrier landing in a flight suit. It would not suprise me to see more troops deployed to Afghanistan in the next year. [/b][/quote]
America has only built one truly stable government in its history as far as I know. A whole lot of verbage, and no real action.

KeyGuy 11-04-2004 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches@Nov 4 2004, 10:00 AM
What's interesting is when I was researching the military for CT, a large percentage of military members said they'd not only do it again, but they'd do it for free.

Jeff, I think you're grossly underestimating the number of people in this country who are willing to fight for what they believe.

The $$$ issues I'm talking about isn't for more pay, it's to increase size so they can recruit more. Right now the AF is required to get rid of 20K enlistees and the Navy is close to that number.

Hands up all the armchair generals on this board that would enlist. And if you would, why haven't you? Its easy to send your neighbours sons and daughters off to war and avoid it yourself. Ask the Bush family for instructions.

dantheman 11-04-2004 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KeyGuy+Nov 4 2004, 04:15 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (KeyGuy @ Nov 4 2004, 04:15 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Peaches@Nov 4 2004, 10:00 AM
What's interesting is when I was researching the military for CT, a large percentage of military members said they'd not only do it again, but they'd do it for free.

Jeff, I think you're grossly underestimating the number of people in this country who are willing to fight for what they believe.

The $$$ issues I'm talking about isn't for more pay, it's to increase size so they can recruit more. Right now the AF is required to get rid of 20K enlistees and the Navy is close to that number.

Hands up all the armchair generals on this board that would enlist. And if you would, why haven't you? Its easy to send your neighbours sons and daughters off to war and avoid it yourself. Ask the Bush family for instructions. [/b][/quote]
been there, we'll talk after you finish bootcamp : ))


SemperFi :salute:

KeyGuy 11-04-2004 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dantheman+Nov 4 2004, 01:42 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (dantheman @ Nov 4 2004, 01:42 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by KeyGuy@Nov 4 2004, 04:15 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Peaches
Quote:

@Nov 4 2004, 10:00 AM
What's interesting is when I was researching the military for CT, a large percentage of military members said they'd not only do it again, but they'd do it for free.

Jeff, I think you're grossly underestimating the number of people in this country who are willing to fight for what they believe.

The $$$ issues I'm talking about isn't for more pay, it's to increase size so they can recruit more. Right now the AF is required to get rid of 20K enlistees and the Navy is close to that number.


Hands up all the armchair generals on this board that would enlist. And if you would, why haven't you? Its easy to send your neighbours sons and daughters off to war and avoid it yourself. Ask the Bush family for instructions.

been there, we'll talk after you finish bootcamp : ))


SemperFi :salute: [/b][/quote]
Past history. Nothing to do with the question.

OldJeff 02-07-2005 06:41 AM

Thought this was an appropriate place for this link

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/06/troops/index.html

Almighty Colin 02-07-2005 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by OldJeff+Feb 7 2005, 06:42 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (OldJeff @ Feb 7 2005, 06:42 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Thought this was an appropriate place for this link

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/06/troops/index.html [/b]


I read that article too. I would have put it in an Iran thread. The interesting part to me was the following:

<!--QuoteBegin-Rumsfeld


If a second war front should open, "it might take somewhat longer, it might be done in a slightly different way, but the estimates I get are that, basically, we're capable of performing the tasks that the president has assigned," Rumsfeld said.
[/quote]

Peaches 02-07-2005 08:47 AM

I should let you guys read all the posts from the people who are TRYING to get into the military but can't because they have bad credit, they have juvenille felonies or adult misdemeanors, childhood asthma, previously broke a bone, they have a GED and not a diploma, etc. Even if you have a child you have to get a waiver and if you're a single parent, you don't get in at all unless you legally assign custody to someone else.

Just lessening some of the requirements would assure more people in the military with zero reason for a draft.

Of course, congress hasn't approved to expand the military and they are, in fact, making the AF and Navy smaller, so it's really a moot point.

OldJeff 02-07-2005 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches@Feb 7 2005, 08:48 AM
I should let you guys read all the posts from the people who are TRYING to get into the military but can't because they have bad credit, they have juvenille felonies or adult misdemeanors, childhood asthma, previously broke a bone, they have a GED and not a diploma, etc. Even if you have a child you have to get a waiver and if you're a single parent, you don't get in at all unless you legally assign custody to someone else.

Just lessening some of the requirements would assure more people in the military with zero reason for a draft.

Of course, congress hasn't approved to expand the military and they are, in fact, making the AF and Navy smaller, so it's really a moot point.

I think the Secretary of Defense has a little bit more information, and his saying that recruitment is below what they expected carries a little more weight than a message board.

Unless we are attacked again, opening additional fronts WILL casue further decrease in recruitment, and WILL eventually lead to a draft. (Unless of course we start leveling entire countries)

Peaches 02-07-2005 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by OldJeff+Feb 7 2005, 10:23 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (OldJeff @ Feb 7 2005, 10:23 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Peaches@Feb 7 2005, 08:48 AM
I should let you guys read all the posts from the people who are TRYING to get into the military but can't because they have bad credit, they have juvenille felonies or adult misdemeanors, childhood asthma, previously broke a bone, they have a GED and not a diploma, etc. Even if you have a child you have to get a waiver and if you're a single parent, you don't get in at all unless you legally assign custody to someone else.

Just lessening some of the requirements would assure more people in the military with zero reason for a draft.

Of course, congress hasn't approved to expand the military and they are, in fact, making the AF and Navy smaller, so it's really a moot point.

I think the Secretary of Defense has a little bit more information, and his saying that recruitment is below what they expected carries a little more weight than a message board.

Unless we are attacked again, opening additional fronts WILL casue further decrease in recruitment, and WILL eventually lead to a draft. (Unless of course we start leveling entire countries) [/b][/quote]
Again, if they lessoned the standards, recruitment would be fine. Also note that he was talking about the guard and reserves, not full time military :awinky: The marines are the only ones that aren't reaching goals and so far that was only for the month of Jan. AF has had their troops reduced 20K by congress and the Navy by 15K. Right now if you fail a class in the AF, you are out. It used to be they would retrain you into another specialty.

The guard and reserves are losing recruits because people are realizing they might actually have to serve instead of doing drills 2 days a month, 2 weeks a year and getting a paycheck and decent benefits for, as my friend in the guard says "Playing Army". It was a great part time job until there was a war.

Winetalk.com 02-07-2005 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KeyGuy@Nov 3 2004, 04:20 PM
I think it will be within a year and a half. After the elation of this election, reality will soon follow.
"Hero dies once, coward dies every day"

PornoDoggy 02-07-2005 12:19 PM

Just lowering the standards is not the answer. For example, of the things that peaches listed (they have bad credit, they have juvenille felonies or adult misdemeanors, childhood asthma, previously broke a bone, they have a GED and not a diploma) all of the non-medical requirements are there for a damned good reason - people with those in their background are far more likely to fail to make it through boot camp or a first enlistment.

BTW ... the 3% blip for the Marines doesn't concern me much. The problems for the Army National Guard is far more significant.

Peaches 02-07-2005 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Feb 7 2005, 01:20 PM
Just lowering the standards is not the answer. For example, of the things that peaches listed (they have bad credit, they have juvenille felonies or adult misdemeanors, childhood asthma, previously broke a bone, they have a GED and not a diploma) all of the non-medical requirements are there for a damned good reason - people with those in their background are far more likely to fail to make it through boot camp or a first enlistment.
Uh, who do you think we're going to get if the draft is activated?

Almighty Colin 02-07-2005 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Feb 7 2005, 12:20 PM

BTW ... the 3% blip for the Marines doesn't concern me much. The problems for the Army National Guard is far more significant.

yeah, agreed

PornoDoggy 02-07-2005 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches+Feb 7 2005, 12:23 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Peaches @ Feb 7 2005, 12:23 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-PornoDoggy@Feb 7 2005, 01:20 PM
Just lowering the standards is not the answer. For example, of the things that peaches listed (they have bad credit, they have juvenille felonies or adult misdemeanors, childhood asthma, previously broke a bone, they have a GED and not a diploma) all of the non-medical requirements are there for a damned good reason - people with those in their background are far more likely to fail to make it through boot camp or a first enlistment.
Uh, who do you think we're going to get if the draft is activated? [/b][/quote]
Peaches,

I don't think we're going to end up with conscription.

Decreasing the standards is not the answer. They are going to have to do what any employer does when faced with an employee recruiting problems.

OldJeff 02-07-2005 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy+Feb 7 2005, 01:05 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (PornoDoggy @ Feb 7 2005, 01:05 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches@Feb 7 2005, 12:23 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-PornoDoggy
Quote:

@Feb 7 2005, 01:20 PM
Just lowering the standards is not the answer. For example, of the things that peaches listed (they have bad credit, they have juvenille felonies or adult misdemeanors, childhood asthma, previously broke a bone, they have a GED and not a diploma) all of the non-medical requirements are there for a damned good reason - people with those in their background are far more likely to fail to make it through boot camp or a first enlistment.


Uh, who do you think we're going to get if the draft is activated?

Peaches,

I don't think we're going to end up with conscription.

Decreasing the standards is not the answer. They are going to have to do what any employer does when faced with an employee recruiting problems. [/b][/quote]
I'll take "Better Pay and Working conditions"

Of course it would make me happier if the cut down on the "need" for more military. You know, maybe use them in the context for which they were form - protecting the United States - instead of whatever the fuck we are doing in the middle east.

No I don't know what they are doing over there, but I do know what they are NOT doing

They are not finding WMD's
They are not fighting terrorist's

And based on Iraq's leaning towards voting in an Ayhatollah (sp) - I looks like they are not doing much of a job at spreading western democracy either.

Peaches 02-07-2005 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Feb 7 2005, 02:05 PM
Peaches,

I don't think we're going to end up with conscription.

Decreasing the standards is not the answer. They are going to have to do what any employer does when faced with an employee recruiting problems.

Well, they're giving good bonuses, so I'm sure that will help. Up to $150K for certain special ops reupping for 6 years.

Mine got a $8K bonus for 4 years and right now his AFSC is giving over $20K for re-enlistment.

It's hard to say they aren't getting much now. We figured out that with his pay, free housing, free food, free medical/dental care, free gym/pool/golf facilities, discounts at the BX and commissary, low cost life insurance etc. He's making about $43K a year. That doesn't include the free education while he's in and the $25K or so for the MGIB. Nor does it include the COLA he'll be getting for Japan and the above mentioned bonuses. No, it's not a lot, but for an uneducated 21 year old, he could do worse. It certainly pays more than first year police and firemen.

Edited to add - my point was that they would decrease the standards before conscription crosses their minds :)

aeon 02-07-2005 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Nov 3 2004, 01:35 PM
I do not think there will be conscription.

If there IS some form of conscription, it will either happen in 2005, or in 2007.

I can guaran-goddamn-t-you that it will NOT happen in 2006 or 2008 (barring an attack that dwarfs 9/11).

Don't make me get all hostile with you. I'm hoping for a draft...I wanna see the neocon's kids splattered all over the street so the democracy they install can elect even more Iranian Mullah's and tell them their kids died for nothing - reality only works for some people when it touches them.

I wanna see a real draft - this isn't vietnam..the guys in the navy and airforce now aren't in the trenches...back then, you navy guys were in the middle of the shit...neck deep...and you guys earned respect - today those kids are looking for an easy way out - some occupational training. Let's drag some of those flag waving shit machines to the front lines - put em' with the marines/army...let them face what real soldiers deal with and see how people react then when they come back in body bags.

Almost 2K kids have died for these free people to vote for an Islamic theocracy. Congrats...we’re spreading fundamental Islam.

Bin Laden is owning Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022