Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   US forces used chemical weapons? (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=44624)

Inabon 11-11-2005 09:04 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoDoggy
Hmmm ... a new board figure emerges.

Drav AI

good one.

Inabon 11-11-2005 09:08 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dravyk
Remind me in the morning to talk about your poor exploited former land. :whistling


don't even try however it will be a fun conversation..

Trev 11-11-2005 10:18 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoDoggy
As I have already stated, I'm not sure that I even consider the munitions in question to be chemical weapons.

I have also previously stated in this thread that American troops on the ground have the right to defend themselves with weapons appropriate to the tactical situation.

That being said - I no more believe that phosphorus was deployed only for illumination purposes than I do GW (and his lackeys, foreign and domestic) when they say this war has made the U.S. (and its lackeys) any safer from terrorism.

Trev, I feel for the local families you are describing. My girlfriend's son has made three combat deployments since 9/11 (he went into Afghanistan in 2001, and has made two deployments to Iraq). We just lost another local kid this week; I've lost count of how many that makes total, but this is the 3rd from the local guard unit this deployment.

However ... You have to admit that it's not very likely that U.S. or U.K. troops would be getting killed by Iraqis if we hadn't invaded their country. You have to admit that the absence of a realistic plan for the occupation of Iraq is a big part of why the resistance has taken hold. You'd be a damned fool to try and claim that citizens of the U.S. or the U.K. are in any way safer from the threat of terrorism as a result of the sacrifices of the poor dumb son-of-a-bitches that get to die for their country.

The "plan" for Iraq was either the result of stupidity that rivals isolationism and/or appeasement of the Fascists, or stupidity that rivals isolationism/appeasement of the Fascists coupled with a cynicism that the Fascists would envy. There are an awful lot of reasons that turning Iraq into a functional democracy would have failed with three times the number of troops to occupy it.

But the cheap-assed method used was guaranteed to fail. Either Bush and his bootlick Blair were stupid enough to believe their own rhetoric about the people greeting us with parades, or they knew damned good and well what kind of chaos would result from this half-assed plan and that the resulting chaos and ensuing conflict was deliberately caused.

Happy fucking Armistice Day ...

Although it pains me to say it, I have to agree with you. Excellent post :)

Timon 11-11-2005 10:50 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
so how bout them onions? :yowsa:

Dravyk 11-11-2005 01:02 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
don't even try however it will be a fun conversation..

Eh, nevermind.

I hate to engage in a battle of wits with the unarmed. :p

Inabon 11-11-2005 01:09 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dravyk
Eh, nevermind.

I hate to engage in a battle of wits with the unarmed. :p

ok GWB or Dravyk AI

Dravyk 11-11-2005 01:29 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
That's it! Keep proving my point. :rolleyes:

PornoDoggy 11-11-2005 01:29 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Timon
so how bout them onions? :yowsa:

What league do they play in?

Timon 11-11-2005 01:48 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoDoggy
What league do they play in?

The Kebab condiments league

JR 11-11-2005 02:26 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
same crap that made credible all the horror shit that happened in vietnam man.


you just don't get it...

everytime some country claims USA abused power it is immediately put down as not credible but when cnn said that sadam had weapons of mass destruction (after bush did) then that is the truth.

that is the fucking point but i am not surprised at the fact that you did not read between the lines.


dude.... no one is talking about "everytime" here. regardless of what massive conspiracy theories you have and what conclusions your professional pyschological analysis of the group here have let you to... people were commenting on ONE article that even the most biased person would have to admit is suspicious.

do you think that all the people you are talking to right now are 100% behind bush.. the war? the decisions that were made? CNN? i could suggest as well that you "don't get it" since its fairly clear you are not paying attention and just looking for an excuse to rant.... which is fine... just a little off point.

your arguments above are a little silly. the fact that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction BEFORE the war was NEVER disputed by anyone but Iraq. It was not disputed by the UN, Hans Blix or anyone else. Lets not start defending Saddam or pretend that the average person had reason to believe that he was just an ok guy. Some in the international community wanted evidence that he was threat or a big enough threat that warranted a war... but NO ONE was disputing what he was up to... and i might add that most of those who were most concerned had all kinds of illegal oil deals in violation of the oil for food program with Saddam or multi billion dollar debts they hoped to collect - France, Russia, China etc. Morality, right and wrong and "facts" have nothing to do with anything. Money makes the world turn.... not happy thoughts and hugs.

Iraq war is not about anything for ANY side other than straight politics and economics. the "hows" "whys" and "whos" are irrelevent. always have been. its all just theater and scenery to conceal the uglier truth.

and when your arguments revolve around language like "everytime" "you don't get it" and "read between the lines"... you have no argument.

Mike AI 11-11-2005 08:18 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Ouch!

I guess he is JR AI

:yowsa:

Quote:

Originally Posted by JR
dude.... no one is talking about "everytime" here. regardless of what massive conspiracy theories you have and what conclusions your professional pyschological analysis of the group here have let you to... people were commenting on ONE article that even the most biased person would have to admit is suspicious.

do you think that all the people you are talking to right now are 100% behind bush.. the war? the decisions that were made? CNN? i could suggest as well that you "don't get it" since its fairly clear you are not paying attention and just looking for an excuse to rant.... which is fine... just a little off point.

your arguments above are a little silly. the fact that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction BEFORE the war was NEVER disputed by anyone but Iraq. It was not disputed by the UN, Hans Blix or anyone else. Lets not start defending Saddam or pretend that the average person had reason to believe that he was just an ok guy. Some in the international community wanted evidence that he was threat or a big enough threat that warranted a war... but NO ONE was disputing what he was up to... and i might add that most of those who were most concerned had all kinds of illegal oil deals in violation of the oil for food program with Saddam or multi billion dollar debts they hoped to collect - France, Russia, China etc. Morality, right and wrong and "facts" have nothing to do with anything. Money makes the world turn.... not happy thoughts and hugs.

Iraq war is not about anything for ANY side other than straight politics and economics. the "hows" "whys" and "whos" are irrelevent. always have been. its all just theater and scenery to conceal the uglier truth.

and when your arguments revolve around language like "everytime" "you don't get it" and "read between the lines"... you have no argument.


Inabon 11-11-2005 08:29 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike AI
Ouch!

I guess he is JR AI

:yowsa:

yeah just another Zealot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealot

Mike AI 11-11-2005 09:01 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Word of the day dictionary?



Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
yeah just another Zealot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealot


PornoDoggy 11-11-2005 09:07 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Now, Mikey ... I don't agree with JR's logic, but at least he used some. Not much, to be sure, and much of it flawed - but there was some there.

The use of logic, even flawed, to make a point automatically disqualifies anyone from the AI label. There are plenty of AI-qualified opponents of the war. AI is more a mindset - in concrete at least, something much harder whenever available.

I 'awarded' Dravyk the AI label when he resorted to your tactics - "And if you can't MAKE your point, it's because you are PANAMANIAN."

You may resort to being condescending now.

Mike AI 11-11-2005 09:32 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
PD When are you going to realize I do not pay attention to your posts?

I skip right over them. I gave up about 2 years ago when I realized you say the same thing over and over again.

No ofense. If you want to continue, please be my guest. I am sure you entertain someone. ( not to mentioned help make Nick some $$ )




Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoDoggy
Now, Mikey ... I don't agree with JR's logic, but at least he used some. Not much, to be sure, and much of it flawed - but there was some there.

The use of logic, even flawed, to make a point automatically disqualifies anyone from the AI label. There are plenty of AI-qualified opponents of the war. AI is more a mindset - in concrete at least, something much harder whenever available.

I 'awarded' Dravyk the AI label when he resorted to your tactics - "And if you can't MAKE your point, it's because you are PANAMANIAN."

You may resort to being condescending now.


PornoDoggy 11-11-2005 09:40 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Odd ... you picked up the Drav AI remark while ignoring my posts.

You've done better than that ...

Inabon 11-11-2005 09:51 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike AI
Word of the day dictionary?

yeah did you read it?

Inabon 11-11-2005 09:54 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoDoggy
Odd ... you picked up the Drav AI remark while ignoring my posts.

You've done better than that ...

there is no use man... the dictionary word fits.


its the same lame old thing just because you are not like him *race, color, or born from the same family* he will never agree.

Inabon 11-11-2005 09:54 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
ermn hold on thats bush logic :)

Dravyk 11-11-2005 11:18 PM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoDoggy
I 'awarded' Dravyk the AI label when he resorted to your tactics - "And if you can't MAKE your point, it's because you are PANAMANIAN."

Ah, well, I have to admit, since Inny can't argue worth crapola, (I lova ya, man, but you get an F in debate class, Inabon) the AI line was appropriate.

So nyah! :harhar01:

Inabon 11-12-2005 12:03 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dravyk
Ah, well, I have to admit, since Inny can't argue worth crapola, (I lova ya, man, but you get an F in debate class, Inabon) the AI line was appropriate.

So nyah! :harhar01:

i am still wondering what you want to argue about??

Inabon 11-12-2005 12:07 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dravyk
Ah, well, I have to admit, since Inny can't argue worth crapola, (I lova ya, man, but you get an F in debate class, Inabon) the AI line was appropriate.

So nyah! :harhar01:

F my ass i am still waiting on your point :)

Timon 11-12-2005 12:26 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
F my ass i am still waiting on your point :)

I think he's following the "don't debate with idiots, they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" rule :p

Dravyk 11-12-2005 01:24 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
F my ass

Ok. Bend over, sweetie.

:bananaban

grimm 11-12-2005 02:02 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
yeah did you read it?

is it in engrish, esse?;)

grimm 11-12-2005 02:04 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
da plane, da plane!

grimm 11-12-2005 02:06 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trev
Although it pains me to say it, I have to agree with you. Excellent post :)


dudr you make excellent points a lot of the time, and i dig your personality, but sometimes i get the feeling if i told you my cum tastes like mouthwash, you'd say "awesome, what flavor"

:):):)

JR 11-12-2005 05:40 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grimm
dudr you make excellent points a lot of the time, and i dig your personality, but sometimes i get the feeling if i told you my cum tastes like mouthwash, you'd say "awesome, what flavor"

:):):)


i misread your post.







now i gotta go brush my teeth. be right back.

Inabon 11-12-2005 05:49 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grimm
is it in engrish, esse?;)

yeah man it is and it is a word a bit more complicated than apple, pie or hamburger.


some of us spics did learn some stuff in school.

Inabon 11-12-2005 05:52 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grimm
dudr you make excellent points a lot of the time, and i dig your personality, but sometimes i get the feeling if i told you my cum tastes like mouthwash, you'd say "awesome, what flavor"

:):):)


SHHHHH donīt say bush said or you will see AI and Mini AIīs with white stuff on their mouth.

(they will probably buy it in a can i just donīt see them with a COCK on their mouth)

Dravyk 11-12-2005 05:57 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
SHHHHH donīt say bush said or you will see AI and Mini AIīs with white stuff on their mouth.

(they will probably buy it in a can i just donīt see them with a COCK on their mouth)

One of the funniest and best posts you've made yet! http://oprano.com/msgboard/images/smilies/ok.gif

So much to laugh at in that little space! .... But I love (fear?) the though of "Mini AI"! http://oprano.com/msgboard/images/sm...tingupNEW3.gif

Inabon 11-12-2005 06:02 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dravyk
One of the funniest and best posts you've made yet! http://oprano.com/msgboard/images/smilies/ok.gif

So much to laugh at in that little space! .... But I love (fear?) the though of "Mini AI"! http://oprano.com/msgboard/images/sm...tingupNEW3.gif


hahaha glad you like it :) after all it is a board and i only deal with threads nothing personal :)

Dravyk 11-12-2005 06:12 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Inabon
hahaha glad you like it :) after all it is a board and i only deal with threads nothing personal :)

Funny you should say that. ;)

Trev 11-12-2005 06:54 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grimm
dudr you make excellent points a lot of the time, and i dig your personality, but sometimes i get the feeling if i told you my cum tastes like mouthwash, you'd say "awesome, what flavor"

:):):)

I think you're right. Even though PD's post was a good one and it did hit the nail on the head in some respects, I think I used it as an easy out from this thread.

:(

Timon 11-12-2005 07:05 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Trev my cum tastes like ice cream :groucho:

Trev 11-12-2005 07:06 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Timon
Trev my cum tastes like ice cream :groucho:

Awesome, what flavour?

Timon 11-12-2005 07:07 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Trev
Awesome, what flavour?

Semen flavour :groucho:

Trev 11-12-2005 07:11 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Timon
Semen flavour :groucho:

Ah damn... I prefer cookies and cream flavour...

Dravyk 11-12-2005 07:14 AM

Re: US forces used chemical weapons?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Timon
Trev my cum tastes like ice cream :groucho:

But he's not -- repeat, not -- perverted! :p


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022