Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   .xxx TLD Near Reality (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=41289)

Rolo 06-02-2005 11:53 AM

More info from the past...

Quote:


By the end of this year, Internet users could have an extraordinarily convenient place to find pornography: a new .xxx top-level domain.

Stuart Lawley, a 41-year-old entrepreneur in Jupiter, Fla., is the unlikely champion for the online equivalent of a red-light district. A British citizen, Lawley swears that he's no smut-seller himself. "I have no current or historic links to the adult industry in any form," he asserts.

That appears to be true. Lawley started Oneview.net, a U.K. business Internet provider, in the 1990s and cashed out at the height of the dot-com craze in March 2000. A profile in the Guardian newspaper a few months earlier pegged his net worth to be in the tens of millions of dollars.

After a brief, sunny retirement in the Bahamas where he learned how to golf and spear fish, Lawley moved to Florida and got the itch to get involved with the Internet again.

"Sex is a very big area on the Internet," Lawley said. "Our research staff surprised me. I couldn't believe how prevalent it was and what the actual statistics were for the number of sites and the number of users."

Under his proposal, submitted last week to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), .xxx domain names would be sold for $70 to $75 each. Child pornography would be verboten, but pretty much anything else would be permissible, Lawley said. "Apart from child pornography, which is completely illegal, we're really not in the content-monitoring business."

Instead, Lawley and his partners are in the business to make money. A report from Reuters Business Insight in February 2003 calculated that sex represented two-thirds of all online content revenue in 2001, and that it had ballooned to a $2.5 billion industry since then. Lawley estimates that 25 percent of all Internet search queries are related to sex and that over a million adult domain names exist. Owning the rights to sell pieces of .xxx real estate, he concluded, would be a perfect way to make money off of consumers' insatiable appetite for online raunch and ribaldry.

Free-expression issues
The way the proposed .xxx registry would work is twofold. Lawley's company, ICM Registry, would handle the technical aspects of running the master database of .xxx sex sites. For its troubles, it would charge $60 a domain name and let resellers add their own markup of perhaps $10 to $15 per domain.

A second, nonprofit organization, the International Foundation for Online Responsibility would be in charge of setting the rules for .xxx. It would have a seven-person board of directors, including a child advocacy advocate, a free-expression aficionado, and, naturally, at least one person from the adult entertainment industry. As president and chairman of ICM Registry, Lawley gives himself just one vote on the board.

The foundation's charter is intentionally quite protective of free speech. It aims to "protect the privacy and security of consenting adult consumers of online adult-entertainment goods and services" and references the free-expression principles in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Unlike online other suggestions for innocuous top-level domains like .travel or .jobs, the proposal for .xxx plunges the Internet into a political stew that's already at a roiling boil. The FCC recently has been tossing around penalties for "indecent" radio broadcasts, while Attorney General John Ashcroft has indicated that a crackdown on obscene Web sites is about to take place.

The problem, in other words, is that as soon as .xxx launches, conservatives in Congress will begin to clamor for laws to make the domain mandatory for sex-related Web sites. That may not be a big deal for hard-core pornmeisters who prefer that virtual street address, but what about sex education sites that include explicit graphics and don't wish to be blocked by filtering software? And where should Salon.com--which features images of topless women--or Playboy.com--which publishes important interviews with U.S. presidents--end up?

Protecting children
This is not just a theoretical concern. Back in 2000, before Lawley got involved as president, ICM Registry applied to run the .xxx domain. But ICANN shot down the proposal.

It didn't take Congress long to get involved. At a hearing in February 2001, Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., demanded to know why ICANN didn't approve .xxx "as a means of protecting our kids from the awful, awful filth which is sometimes widespread on the Internet." Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., griped to a federal commission that .xxx was necessary to force adult Webmasters to "abide by the same standard as the proprietor of an X-rated movie theater."

To his credit, Lawley is pledging a legal defense fund of $250,000 to "maintain the voluntary nature of the domain name system." He's also hired Robert Corn-Revere, a top-notch lawyer at Davis Wright Tremaine who has represented Playboy Entertainment Group before the U.S. Supreme Court, to research whether Congress could get away with ordering sex-themed Web sites to slap .xxx at the end of their address. Corn-Revere's conclusion: The .xxx folks "should prevail in any ensuing litigation if any attempt is made by the government to require registration in a .xxx domain."

Barry Steinhardt, head of the ACLU's technology and liberty program, isn't nearly as optimistic. "I am not quite so confident that we will prevail" under existing First Amendment precedents, Steinhardt said.

But the ACLU's real concerns with the proposal lie overseas. "There are nations all over the world that will undoubtedly try to force Web sites into the .xxx (top-level domain) or to block Web sites in it that they somehow view as offensive," Steinhardt said. "I don't think the operators have taken sufficient account of that problem. It will become a worldwide red-light district for the Internet, into which speakers who have free expression rights and should be able to reach a mass audience, will be forced."

Maybe U.S. politicians have matured in the last four years. Perhaps courts can now be trusted to do the right thing and uphold the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of expression. But given that the House of Representatives voted by a 18-to-1 margin just two weeks ago to boost the penalties for "profane" broadcasts, the initially voluntary .xxx district may turn out to be a one-way street.

http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-5176620.html

Almighty Colin 06-02-2005 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nickatilynx+Jun 2 2005, 10:51 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Nickatilynx @ Jun 2 2005, 10:51 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Almighty Colin@Jun 2 2005, 07:41 AM
I don't even know any "responsible adult-entertainment Web site operators "; and I know a lot of ya.
Bullshit!!!

Everytime someone gets some spam......., Microsoft , hotmail , AOL always say "Nickatilynx is responsible"

:) [/b][/quote]
:wnw:

gonzo 06-02-2005 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rolo@Jun 2 2005, 10:40 AM
IFFOR got the support of the religious:

Quote:


[stld-rfp-xxx] Great Idea
To: stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [stld-rfp-xxx] Great Idea
From: "Benjamin Orteg" <borteg121@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:48:48 +0000
Cc: stld-rfp-general@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find IFFOR's proposal for the .xxx to be a tremendous move forward for the Internet community. This should finally bring a degree of structure to the unharnessed adult content that falls onto the computers of children and minors.

However, it is not clear how IFFOR proposes to migrate the existing adult content within the .com domain over to the .xxx domain. Ideally, we should have all the adult content within an adult TLD. This is your goal IFFOR. No?

Benjamin Ortega
Atlanta, GA

http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00000.html

Man and Bat has been contacted that falls in our local jurisdiction!

Newton 06-02-2005 11:56 AM

This is an interesting read on how it could potentially be forced through, under the "Truth in Domain Names Act"

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,60145,00.html

*KK* 06-02-2005 12:11 PM

Wow, here's a surprise. This industry has gangrene in a leg so the idea is to give the foot a pedicure?

Real child pornographers don't give a fuck about .com, .xxx, or dot anyfuckingthing.

This isn't going to stop them, or even put a dent in their operations. All this does is make the rest of the adult internet into a sitting duck target.

I'm not sure that AVN supports or doesn't support the .xxx situation, they're simply reporting news it appears.

Timon 06-02-2005 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin+Jun 2 2005, 10:39 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Almighty Colin @ Jun 2 2005, 10:39 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Timon@Jun 2 2005, 09:20 AM
I call XXX.XXX

Nobody else register it, it's mine!!!!

amsterdamnxxx.xxx [/b][/quote]
oh I call amsterdamncumbath.xxx too :lol:

gonzo 06-02-2005 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 11:12 AM
Wow, here's a surprise. This industry has gangrene in a leg so the idea is to give the foot a pedicure?

Real child pornographers don't give a fuck about .com, .xxx, or dot anyfuckingthing.

This isn't going to stop them, or even put a dent in their operations. All this does is make the rest of the adult internet into a sitting duck target.

I'm not sure that AVN supports or doesn't support the .xxx situation, they're simply reporting news it appears.

What are you calling gangrene?

Rolo 06-02-2005 12:41 PM

Here is one more supporter, beside helmy/gigacash/asacp:

Quote:


[stld-rfp-xxx] A Responsible First Step for the Adult Industry
To: <stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [stld-rfp-xxx] A Responsible First Step for the Adult Industry
From: "Lawrence G. Walters" <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:12:42 -0500
Importance: Normal
Organization: Weston, Garrou & DeWitt
Sender: owner-stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the good of the adult Internet industry, this proposal should be approved. Having provided legal representation to the adult webmaster community since 1995, along with other facets of the adult industry for years before, I’ve seen many unsuccessful attempts to organize and speak with a united voice. Organizing in the adult Internet industry is essential; just as it is with any other highly-regulated industry. My law firm has represented the adult industry for over 40 years, and has been involved in many organizing efforts. It may be that the only way for this particular facet of the industry to organize is through a non-profit foundation structured to support both the online adult community and the broader Internet community funded through .xxx registration revenue. A .xxx domain name option will eventually become a reality, and the current proposal will result in significant benefit to the industry as a whole, given the significant funding that IFFOR could potentially secure for the purposes of lobbying, legal defense, and media outreach.

When compared to a generic TLD proposal, the current Sponsored TLD proposal is definitely preferable. In light of the current political climate in the United States and elsewhere, IFFOR could become a critical voice for the continued viability and success of the adult website industry. Regardless of one’s feelings concerning the esoteric advisability of a voluntary .xxx domain name registration option, the practical realities must be addressed. Some entity will ultimately convince ICANN to approve a TLD for the adult industry. The current proposal by ICM Registries, Inc., sponsored by IFFOR, will bestow benefits on the industry which far outweigh any of the potential concerns advanced to date. The webmaster community should get behind this proposal which will give something back, instead of waiting for another group to submit a generic TLD proposal based purely on profit motive.

http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00003.html

http://www.lawrencewalters.com/image...image_home.jpg
http://www.lawrencewalters.com/

TheEnforcer 06-02-2005 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gonzo+Jun 2 2005, 10:14 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gonzo @ Jun 2 2005, 10:14 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Phoenix@Jun 2 2005, 10:10 AM
the blood is in the water, but does everyone know who the sharks are...
Ask TE he is our local authority on sharks. [/b][/quote]
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Grump 06-02-2005 12:53 PM

My guess what will happen next. Some local government will propose a law banning their population from having access to .xxx domains citing "community standards". ISP's will be ordered to block all access.

Then following the .us "no anonymous domain registration" edict, a similar law will come out banning anonymous .xxx registrations.

Nothing like herding your targets into a small enclosed area.

Long live King George!

Sandee:) 06-02-2005 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Grump@Jun 2 2005, 08:54 AM
My guess what will happen next. Some local government will propose a law banning their population from having access to .xxx domains citing "community standards". ISP's will be ordered to block all access.
No more porn for Asia :cryin:

Sandee:)

gonzo 06-02-2005 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rolo@Jun 2 2005, 11:42 AM
Here is one more supporter, beside helmy/gigacash/asacp:

Quote:


[stld-rfp-xxx] A Responsible First Step for the Adult Industry
To: <stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [stld-rfp-xxx] A Responsible First Step for the Adult Industry
From: "Lawrence G. Walters" <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:12:42 -0500
Importance: Normal
Organization: Weston, Garrou & DeWitt
Sender: owner-stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the good of the adult Internet industry, this proposal should be approved. Having provided legal representation to the adult webmaster community since 1995, along with other facets of the adult industry for years before, I’ve seen many unsuccessful attempts to organize and speak with a united voice. Organizing in the adult Internet industry is essential; just as it is with any other highly-regulated industry. My law firm has represented the adult industry for over 40 years, and has been involved in many organizing efforts. It may be that the only way for this particular facet of the industry to organize is through a non-profit foundation structured to support both the online adult community and the broader Internet community funded through .xxx registration revenue. A .xxx domain name option will eventually become a reality, and the current proposal will result in significant benefit to the industry as a whole, given the significant funding that IFFOR could potentially secure for the purposes of lobbying, legal defense, and media outreach.

When compared to a generic TLD proposal, the current Sponsored TLD proposal is definitely preferable. In light of the current political climate in the United States and elsewhere, IFFOR could become a critical voice for the continued viability and success of the adult website industry. Regardless of one’s feelings concerning the esoteric advisability of a voluntary .xxx domain name registration option, the practical realities must be addressed. Some entity will ultimately convince ICANN to approve a TLD for the adult industry. The current proposal by ICM Registries, Inc., sponsored by IFFOR, will bestow benefits on the industry which far outweigh any of the potential concerns advanced to date. The webmaster community should get behind this proposal which will give something back, instead of waiting for another group to submit a generic TLD proposal based purely on profit motive.

http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00003.html

http://www.lawrencewalters.com/image...image_home.jpg
http://www.lawrencewalters.com/

COCKSUCKER!!!

Lee 06-02-2005 02:49 PM

From what i recall, circa '03 werent the FSC for this idea because one (or more) of their members had significant financial ties to the .xxx registry people?

Again, i could be wrong but that was the first thing i thought of when i heard about this.

Aly_AVN 06-02-2005 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gonzo@Jun 1 2005, 10:14 PM
Aly I sure hope like hell they are paying you enough. Heat for Internext and now this bag of shit. Since you posted it...care to comment on how you think this is a good thing?
I do not, and have NEVER claimed otherwise.

It has also never been supported by AVN.

gonzo 06-02-2005 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aly_AVN+Jun 2 2005, 02:17 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Aly_AVN @ Jun 2 2005, 02:17 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-gonzo@Jun 1 2005, 10:14 PM
Aly I sure hope like hell they are paying you enough. Heat for Internext and now this bag of shit. Since you posted it...care to comment on how you think this is a good thing?
I do not, and have NEVER claimed otherwise.

It has also never been supported by AVN. [/b][/quote]
AVNonline is not in support of this?

Aly_AVN 06-02-2005 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gonzo+Jun 2 2005, 11:48 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gonzo @ Jun 2 2005, 11:48 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Aly_AVN@Jun 2 2005, 02:17 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-gonzo
Quote:

@Jun 1 2005, 10:14 PM
Aly I sure hope like hell they are paying you enough. Heat for Internext and now this bag of shit. Since you posted it...care to comment on how you think this is a good thing?


I do not, and have NEVER claimed otherwise.

It has also never been supported by AVN.

AVNonline is not in support of this? [/b][/quote]
No.

Trev 06-02-2005 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aly_AVN+Jun 2 2005, 09:02 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Aly_AVN @ Jun 2 2005, 09:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by gonzo@Jun 2 2005, 11:48 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by Aly_AVN@Jun 2 2005, 02:17 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-gonzo

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 1 2005, 10:14 PM
Aly I sure hope like hell they are paying you enough. Heat for Internext and now this bag of shit. Since you posted it...care to comment on how you think this is a good thing?


I do not, and have NEVER claimed otherwise.

It has also never been supported by AVN.


AVNonline is not in support of this?

No. [/b][/quote]
What are your personal views on this, if you have any...

gonzo 06-02-2005 04:15 PM

So far it looks like Larry Walters and some other unnamed group thats a spokes person for this industry things its a good thing.

I cant tell if Helmy and his anti-CP group are for or against this as well. They only grace the Zoo with showing up.

DrGuile 06-02-2005 04:16 PM

It is my understanding that ASACP will get 10$ of every registration, and that this will go to an effort to make the use of .xxx domains mandatory for adult companies.

I might be mistaken... someone please tell me Im wrong.

and then tell me that ASACP is owned(operated?) by Helmy... ?

Newton 06-02-2005 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DrGuile@Jun 2 2005, 12:17 PM
It is my understanding that ASACP will get 10$ of every registration, and that this will go to an effort to make the use of .xxx domains mandatory for adult companies.

I might be mistaken... someone please tell me Im wrong.

and then tell me that ASACP is owned(operated?) by Helmy... ?

fuck .. i offered them incestry.com for FREE to keep it out of the public domain, and in their hands to protect its use. They never even bothered to reply so now it drops ..

gonzo 06-02-2005 04:28 PM

I like to report too. So heres a little information where my down south buddy Mike South says his piece back to AVN.....

******
Paul Fishbein Writes:

AVN President Paul Fishbein posts:

For those who trash us on the boards and speak without any knowledge of what's really going on (yes Mike South, you), here's the story. In the early days, at the encouragement of a couple of our biggest clients, we had meetings with Jason Hendeles concerning AVN's potential involvement with the .XXX business. We viewed it as a business opportunity. We sought the advice of many in the adult business, some of whom felt that the .XXX domains would "ghettoize" the adult business, while others felt there was a real opportunity.

However, we never made a deal with Jason and to date have no involvement in .XXX.

That last sentence speaks volumes, the truth is you SHOULD have had involvement and you should have seen it for the bad move that it is. Instead you chose to stick your head in the sand and sell us out by not doing anything. or did you do something?

Mike South Sez....
From My Site: 07/27/2004 For all of you asking why .XXX is a bad idea...READ THIS:

.XXX Still Not Dead, And AVNOnline is Helping to Pimp It:

The key word here being pimp of course.

lets look at whose who in this battle:

First you Have ICMRegistry and their little used car salesman Jason Hendales, Jason's job is to garner support for the .XXX domain for ICMRegistry so that they can try to ramrod it through ICANN. The proposed price tag for .XXX domains 75.00/yr.

Second, You have knowledgeable adult webmasters, attorneys and lobbyists like myself, Jeffrey Douglas, J.D. Obenberger and Bill Lyon who are against this, for reasons I will spell out in a bit.

Third You have parties in the biz, who, out of ignorance or alterior motive or both would support this under the guise of....you guessed it....keeping the children safe. These include LFP, Vivid, AVN and some of the board of the Free Speech Cabal. Though AVN has been passive in it's support, it's editorials speak for themselves.

Take the recent issue of AVNOnline where they lay out the story noting that the Free Speech Coalition held a special meeting to discuss and vote on this. AVN reported that the members in attendance voted it in BUT the big bad wolf (Then Director of the FSC) Bill Lyon vetoed the vote and called on the board of directors to decide the issue. Now here is the FACT that changes the whole story that AVN conveniently left out.

The night of the vote ICMRegistry brought in a bunch of "Ringers", they paid the dues for them to join the FSC so that they could vote in favor of .XXX, thus guaranteeing that the measure would pass. Bill Lyon saw through this ruse and did the right thing.

They also conveniently left out the fact that the FSC had been BRIBED to pass the measure....reportedly to the tune of 8.00 per domain sold. That's a hefty chunk of change and was certainly enough to buy the votes of some of the FSC Board members with less integrity than Lyon. Lawrence Walters and Greg Picconelli were salivating at the idea too because passage is job security for them as you will soon see.

So when you come right down to it, it's all about the money. ICM Registry will make millions off of this and thus will go to great lengths to sell it, even if it means selling us out.

Now some of you might be thinking that this aint such a bad idea, you are wrong, here's why:

It doesn't "protect the children", kids dont get porn from responsible adult sites, they get it off of kazaa, bearshare, limewire, morpheus, IRC and others.

It does "Zone" adult into a cyber ghetto, they say that we won't be required to use it but ask yourself this: Does your state have seatbelt laws? Remember how they sold that? They said Oh we won't just pull you over and give you a ticket for not wearing it, we just want to enact it to protect you and your children, now "Click It Or Ticket Campaigns are rampant right? Just how long do you think it would take Ashcroft or someone of similar narrow mindedness to pass legislation "protecting the children" by forcing adult sites to use .XXX. Picconelli and Walters say no way they can't do that but I guarantee you these two hot shots aren't going to represent you for free to prove it. For them .XXX is money in the bank, fuck what's good for the industry.

How long would it take your city or state to demand that ISPs "filter out" the .XXX domain or lose permission to provide service to you? Specially if you live in, say Utah?

Starting to see the problems now? Ya I thought you might.

You see its all about the money, ICM Registry, Picconelli, Walters...these people could give a fuck because they are going to make money, even if only because adult webmasters will buy the .XXX domains to protect them from cybersquatting, at least that's what they are counting on.

Next time you hear AVN wanting to speak for the adult webmaster community, remember this people. You gonna be at Internext? Tell them to stop trying to sell you to the highest bidder.

That's the way I see it.

Aly_AVN 06-02-2005 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gonzo@Jun 2 2005, 12:29 PM
I like to report too. So heres a little information where my down south buddy Mike South says his piece back to AVN.....


To which I responded:

What on earth makes you think that AVN has the power (or inclination) to "sell" webmasters to the highest bidder?! AVN produces adult industry publications and events. It is not some higher power, and it is not a political lobbying organization like the FSC.

The fact that AVN didn't take a stand on one side of the issue or the other is, in my opinion, more testament to the organization's integrity than NOT (They COULD have made money but chose not to). I'm not saying I disagree with your stand on this but at that time, and still today, our industry was and is divided on .xxx . In my opinion, AVN has a responsibility to write the news, not create it. Any power it has can and is used to actively support organizations like the FSC. However you ascribe far more direct political power and responsibility to AVN than is warranted.

Aly_AVN 06-02-2005 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 12:08 PM

What are your personal views on this, if you have any...

Understand that this is just MY opinion and I'm just a simple girl from Scotland who may be missing something obvious...
Given the current political witchhunt against the adult industry and, by my perception, a 'moral' veer to the right internationally, creating our very own ghetto is a very dangerous thing to do. In an ideal world this could be a 'cute' idea. 'Your one-stop-shop for GIRLS GIRLS GIRLS!' But we don't exist in that world, we exist in a country (those in the USA) that is far from democratic, that has exactly the type of government the Constitution was created to protect Americans from. So this is very dangerous, IMO.

That said, I don't think the sky is falling... Somehow, I don't think this'll do us all in.

Trev 06-02-2005 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aly_AVN+Jun 2 2005, 09:45 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Aly_AVN @ Jun 2 2005, 09:45 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Trev@Jun 2 2005, 12:08 PM

What are your personal views on this, if you have any...

Understand that this is just MY opinion and I'm just a simple girl from Scotland who may be missing something obvious...
Given the current political witchhunt against the adult industry and, by my perception, a 'moral' veer to the right internationally, creating our very own ghetto is a very dangerous thing to do. In an ideal world this could be a 'cute' idea. 'Your one-stop-shop for GIRLS GIRLS GIRLS!' But we don't exist in that world, we exist in a country (those in the USA) that is far from democratic, that has exactly the type of government the Constitution was created to protect Americans from. So this is very dangerous, IMO.

That said, I don't think the sky is falling... Somehow, I don't think this'll do us all in. [/b][/quote]
It appears we have a very similar view on this. I won't be buying into the .xxx scene but I know a lot of webmasters will. So the money will be made and the targets will be painted… whether it will be the .xxx targets or .com targets is yet to unfold.

SykkBoy 06-02-2005 04:51 PM

I would like to know who is all behind this too as I will not be doing any more business with them...fuck them and let them sell everyone else down the river...fuck them and fuck them good...

*If* AVN is behind it, I'll never attend another InterNext again...yeah, I know, they won't miss one little webmaster, but I'll also go out of my way to let everyone else know who is behind this and urge them to boycott ALL of those involved...

Mike AI 06-02-2005 05:00 PM

Looks to me like the same people who negotiated patent agreements with our favorite company.

There is definately a pattern here.

I am not saying if it is good or bad, it is just business. If people can make a buck selling others out, they will do it. Life has always been that way.

There are no friends in business, only interests.

As deepthroat once said... "follow the money"

Aly_AVN 06-02-2005 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Jun 2 2005, 12:52 PM
I would like to know who is all behind this too as I will not be doing any more business with them...fuck them and let them sell everyone else down the river...fuck them and fuck them good...

*If* AVN is behind it, I'll never attend another InterNext again...yeah, I know, they won't miss one little webmaster, but I'll also go out of my way to let everyone else know who is behind this and urge them to boycott ALL of those involved...

If AVN were behind this I be demanding a very hefty raise right now! LOL...

Not true though... See you at Internext! B)

Aly_AVN 06-02-2005 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike AI@Jun 2 2005, 01:01 PM
Looks to me like the same people who negotiated patent agreements with our favorite company.

There is definately a pattern here.

I am not saying if it is good or bad, it is just business. If people can make a buck selling others out, they will do it. Life has always been that way.

There are no friends in business, only interests.

As deepthroat once said... "follow the money"

Well put. :okthumb:

nlphoto 06-02-2005 05:16 PM

what was old is new again... hey Jim, do you and Vickie remember this identical discussion on the YNot board back in 98 ???

domain.xxx .sex .whatever = virtual ghettoization of adult, and far too easy to block. was bad idea then and is just as bad now... do you really think that it would take much for VISA/MC to institute a "move to .xxx or lose your processing" policy ?

SykkBoy 06-02-2005 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike AI@Jun 2 2005, 04:01 PM
Looks to me like the same people who negotiated patent agreements with our favorite company.

There is definately a pattern here.

I am not saying if it is good or bad, it is just business. If people can make a buck selling others out, they will do it. Life has always been that way.

There are no friends in business, only interests.

As deepthroat once said... "follow the money"

yup, figures...they see shrinking margins in adult and figure they'll take all they can as everyone else goes down....but sadly, few in this industry will give a fuck..they'll kiss ass on these people and still send traffic to them because they have a picture of a nice car on their website...

Nickatilynx 06-02-2005 05:35 PM

Sorry guys , but to be absolutely honest here...

Lets say it is Cybererotica is behind all this , and they are gonna make huge money from it and everyone else is gonna get fucked in the ass.

They aren't doing anything illegal or anything else.

Well since when do they have to run there business affairs to best serve you bunch of wankers?

I run a business to make ME money , I'm not an industry leader ,a spokesman for the "adult Industry" or anything else. I am a businessman. LOL

If I could make $50 million legitmately in thise business , but by doing it every person that posted on this board became unemployed I wouldn't give a monkeys toss frankly. :)

I'd employ some of you to come along for the ride though. You always need someone to help you pick the colour of your next Bentley.

:)

DrGuile 06-02-2005 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nickatilynx@Jun 2 2005, 04:36 PM
I'd employ some of you to come along for the ride though. You always need someone to help you pick the colour of your next Bentley.

:)

Might even give us some housing...

http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/fimage/li...s/fof-2.21.jpg

Aly_AVN 06-02-2005 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nickatilynx@Jun 2 2005, 01:36 PM

I'd employ some of you to come along for the ride though. You always need someone to help you pick the colour of your next Bentley.

:)

ooh... I'll send you my CV, I'm fabulous with colour! :awinky:

*KK* 06-02-2005 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gonzo@Jun 2 2005, 08:28 AM

What are you calling gangrene?

Well, now that you ask, I'd actually like to revise my statement. This industry is gangrene. If the pedicure makes the nails look nice, well, the last time I heard the nails don't gangrene.

I agree with Nick, those that are in the .xxx for profit aren't breaking any laws. Any webmasters dumb enough to buy into the TLD aren't breaking any intelligence barriers either though.

Trev 06-02-2005 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nickatilynx@Jun 2 2005, 10:36 PM
Sorry guys , but to be absolutely honest here...

Lets say it is Cybererotica is behind all this , and they are gonna make huge money from it and everyone else is gonna get fucked in the ass.

They aren't doing anything illegal or anything else.

Well since when do they have to run there business affairs to best serve you bunch of wankers?

I run a business to make ME money , I'm not an industry leader ,a spokesman for the "adult Industry" or anything else. I am a businessman. LOL

If I could make $50 million legitmately in thise business , but by doing it every person that posted on this board became unemployed I wouldn't give a monkeys toss frankly. :)

I'd employ some of you to come along for the ride though. You always need someone to help you pick the colour of your next Bentley.

:)

:wnw:

If I had the money, pull and power to do it all legally I'd shoot a load in every ones eye if it made me $50mil.

Newton 06-02-2005 06:02 PM

red is next years black :okthumb:
http://www.xxxamigoz.com/pop.gif

gonzo 06-02-2005 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM

I agree with Nick, those that are in the .xxx for profit aren't breaking any laws. Any webmasters dumb enough to buy into the TLD aren't breaking any intelligence barriers either though.

True statements!

Mike AI 06-02-2005 06:29 PM

Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o

Trev 06-02-2005 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike AI@Jun 2 2005, 11:30 PM
Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o

'We' as in Directnic or 'we' as in MikeAI?

SykkBoy 06-02-2005 06:34 PM

I'm not denying the business aspect of it...I'm just sick of these guys selling everyone else down the river and claiming to be industry leaders and other such horseshit...the only thing they lead this industry in is fucking everyone else...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 AM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022